comparison of accuracy of uncorrected and corrected sagittal tomography in detection of mandibular condyle erosions: an exvivo study

background: radiographic examination of tmj is indicated when there are clinical signs of pathological conditions, mainly bone changes that may influence the diagnosis and treatment planning. the purpose of this study was to evaluate and to compare the validity and diagnostic accuracy of uncorrected and corrected sagittal tomographic images in the detection of simulated mandibular condyle erosions.      methods: simulated lesions were created in 10 dry mandibles using a dental round bur. using uncorrected and corrected sagittal tomography techniques, mandibular condyles were imaged by a cranex tome x-ray unit before and after creating the lesions. the uncorrected and corrected tomography images were examined by two independent observers for absence or presence of a lesion. the accuracy for detecting mandibular condyle lesions was expressed as sensitivity, specificity, and validity values. differences between the two radiographic modalities were tested by wilcoxon for paired data tests. inter-observer agreement was determined by cohen's kappa. results: the sensitivity, specificity and validity were 45%, 85% and 30% in uncorrected sagittal tomographic images, respectively, and 70%, 92.5% and 60% in corrected sagittal tomographic images, respectively. there was a significant statistical difference between the accuracy of uncorrected and corrected sagittal tomography in detection of mandibular condyle erosions (p=0.016). the inter-observer agreement was slight for uncorrected sagittal tomography and moderate for corrected sagittal tomography. conclusion: the accuracy of corrected sagittal tomography is significantly higher than that of uncorrected sagittal tomography. therefore, corrected sagittal tomography seems to be a better modality in detection of mandibular condyle erosions.